Jump to content
The Great War (1914-1918) Forum

Who is This ? ? ?


Stoppage Drill

Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, RaySearching said:

Were they both casualties ?

 

Ray

Yes Ray, both killed. Sorry for the delayed response. I'm at work. 

We just need to know who they were now for the connection. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having no idea who they are and working on the premise that they were both casualties

I took a logical approach from the clue Oct 3rd Ypres

 

entering 1st Oct  17 - 31 Oct 17 and the regiment as KOYLI in Geoff's search engine

fetches up 460  casualtys

disregarding those not in the 4th Bn  and those not officers

 

these two stick out

 

moorhouse.JPG.ee6df0bca4826a4ad179b76279482f57.JPG

 

 

Moorhouse R W + Moorhouse H

 

Cwgc shows both were KIA on the 9th father and son

 

a google search for the Moorhouse's

fetches up the source  of the photos

 

Here

 

 

Ray

 

Edit  I see N F that you replied confirming they were casualties whilst i was composing my post

Edited by RaySearching
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RaySearching said:

Having no idea who they are and working on the premise that they were both casualties

I took a logical approach from the clue Oct 3rd Ypres

 

entering 1st Oct  17 - 31 Oct 17 and the regiment as KOYLI in Geoff's search engine

fetches up 460  casualtys

disregarding those not in the 4th Bn  and those not officers

 

these two stick out

 

moorhouse.JPG.ee6df0bca4826a4ad179b76279482f57.JPG

 

 

Moorhouse R W + Moorhouse H

 

Cwgc shows both were KIA on the 9th father and son

 

a google search for the Moorhouse's

fetches up the source  of the photos

 

Here

 

 

Ray

Excellent piece of work Ray. You have them. Well played. ??

http://www.flandersfields.be/en/1917/footsteps-harry-ronald-moorhouse-uk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they would have been the Simpsons, not the Moorhouses.

 

Ron

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talking of fiendishly clever, (and taking into consideration the fact that I seem to have been fighting a defensive battle elsewhere just lately,) who is this Herr???

Defender.JPG.29f54327ebb08b37faee459cfb9bcf94.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I posted him (or identified him) once before, but no matter. He is one of the most important figures in WW1 in my opinion, and definitely a challenge for the current keen crop of WiT? inmates.

 

Pete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Fattyowls said:

I think I posted him (or identified him) once before, but no matter. He is one of the most important figures in WW1 in my opinion, and definitely a challenge for the current keen crop of WiT? inmates.

 

Pete.

I'm sorry Pete, I didn't realise that he had been posted before and should have checked. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, neverforget said:

I'm sorry Pete, I didn't realise that he had been posted before and should have checked. 

 

Au contraire mon ami; I think repeaters are a Good Thing. WiT? now has a new cast of dramatis personae and as long as reprehensible show offs like myself can show previously unheard of self discipline (as per Headmaster Ridgus' elegant put down some pages back), I think we will see some interesting quests. I was particularly impressed with Ray's deductive logic above, and it will be interesting to see if with your man we arrive at the same place by a different route.

 

Pete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RaySearching said:

As the foxhunter's in June shouted Tally Ho

? I'm trying to decide if you know him and this be a cryptic clue, or if you are up for the chase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fattyowls said:

 

Au contraire mon ami; I think repeaters are a Good Thing. WiT? now has a new cast of dramatis personae and as long as reprehensible show offs like myself can show previously unheard of self discipline (as per Headmaster Ridgus' elegant put down some pages back), I think we will see some interesting quests. I was particularly impressed with Ray's deductive logic above, and it will be interesting to see if with your man we arrive at the same place by a different route.

 

Pete.

 

I endorse my good friend's comments on Ray's solution above - a classic piece of WIT? deduction. And what a tragic story, the reaction of those at home can barely be imagined

 

David

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To help further with #6010; Ray's cryptic clue is double-edged. 

The chase was on largely due to him, (Jerry, not Ray) and it started in April.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Friedrich von Lossberg, who had a successful career as an Amy Chief of Staff.

 

Ron

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, who's this? He was a very fine man, a distinguished civil servant who worked closely with Ll.G, WSC and, er, Beatrice Potter.

image.jpg

Edited by Uncle George
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Point of order, guv. Do you mean Beatrix Potter, the well-known Lake District rabbit pie fancier?

Or Beatrice Potter, the social investigator who  married Sidney Webb in 1896?   If the latter, then this man must have worked for her before 1896?  Is this correct?

     You wouldn't be trying to mislead us perchance????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Uncle George said:

a distinguished civil servant

 

Did the distinguished civil servant serve abroad during he great war ?

 

Ray 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

   Herbert Llewellyn-Smith.  Editor of the "New Survey of London Life and Labour"- As a bookseller, I bought some of his books-inlcuding the Survey with presentation inscription to his daughter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about this chap who had very recently (100 years ago) decided to join the fray???

20170409_082120.png.632ce6c38ee42f2e0a404791504abd20.png

 

 

Edited by neverforget
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reminds me of van Gogh but can't be :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is he from the Latin America region, looks a bit of a Mexican stereotype from the spaghetti westerns of the late 60's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...