Jump to content
The Great War (1914-1918) Forum

Mystery soldiers.


Miss Jones

Recommended Posts

Photo on OP, right arm, holding swagger stick, he has the spur arm badge.

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see the tip of an ear but what looks like scarring under the eye by the nose and also under the nose and on the jawline.  This was via expanding the photo on my phone so could be misleading.  I think the hair has been coloured in or touched up.  There dnt appear to be any wound stripes either.

I can see the tip of an ear but what looks like scarring under the eye by the nose and also under the nose and on the jawline.  This was via expanding the photo on my phone so could be misleading.  I think the hair has been coloured in or touched up.  There dnt appear to be any wound stripes either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Dragoon said:

Photo on OP, right arm, holding swagger stick, he has the spur arm badge.

Chris

 

FB_IMG_1599351514109.jpg.b7b893654ef35cfe07d630d2f95a134e~2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Dragoon said:

Photo on OP, right arm, holding swagger stick, he has the spur arm badge.

Chris


I spotted that too Chris, but after long squinting and rumination I think it’s a freak of light and shadow formed from folds in the cloth.  I’d be interested to know what others think.  In part my conclusion was also based on the fact that a spur badge marks a Roughrider or instructor of equitation as it’s formally known.  They were badges issued and used in units at mounted duty, so I don’t think it could have applied to the soldier shown given his absence of spurs, whip, mounted duty puttees and wearing what appears to be a RWF shoulder title.

Edited by FROGSMILE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just scanned through this thread so apols if this has been raised by others, but it looks to me as if his left arm is prosthetic.  It's very straight and his left shoulder is a little oddly shaped.  Given that his left leg is also dead straight, I wonder if he also sustained wounds there?  Perhaps part of the left leg is also prosthetic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Buffnut453 said:

Just scanned through this thread so apols if this has been raised by others, but it looks to me as if his left arm is prosthetic.  It's very straight and his left shoulder is a little oddly shaped.  Given that his left leg is also dead straight, I wonder if he also sustained wounds there?  Perhaps part of the left leg is also prosthetic?

That's what I said, a prosthetic. It's far too straight isn't it? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if the original shot shows more of the boots? Is it cropped there?

I agree I also see a trade patch on his right arm.

 

With regard to the limbs:

I agree both left leg and left arm are very straight.

The left hand looks as though it could be  be natural, or a good prosthesis. There aren't any visible hinges on the digits which you might well see in a prosthetic hand that  can form a fist.

However, if we assume that he has lost both his left arm and left leg, and had severe facial and head injuries, would he be likely to don an uniform ever again?

Such injuries must surely have resulted in his discharge from the army.

I can't describe his facial expression as a smile as such, but I'm sure we have all read far more misery and pain into portraits than this man conveys.

In which case one must applaud his spirit in getting up again after suffering whatever he sustained.

 

As regards facial scarring, I'm inclined to think we are seeing a lot of JPEG artefact in the picture, which is I'm afraid to say due to the quality of the digital image.

 

A really High res scan is vital.

 

Edited by Dai Bach y Sowldiwr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Dai Bach y Sowldiwr said:

 

However, if we assume that he has lost both his left arm and left leg, and had severe facial and head injuries, would he be likely to don an uniform ever again?

Such injuries must surely have resulted in his discharge from the army.

 

 

I agree, if he had lost a limb/limbs the likely hood would have been a discharge, or a photo of him in Hospital Blues , but not in uniform 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FROGSMILE said:


I spotted that too Chris, but after long squinting and rumination I think it’s a freak of light and shadow formed from folds in the cloth.  I’d be interested to know what others think.  In part my conclusion was also based on the fact that a spur badge marks a Roughrider or instructor of equitation as it’s formally known.  They were badges issued in used in units at mounted duty so I don’t think it could have applied to the soldier shown given his absence of spurs, whip, mounted duty puttees and wearing what appears to be a RWF shoulder title.

 

"a freak of light and shadow formed from folds in the cloth" ......... spot on for the reasons you state.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Miss Jones said:

That's what I said, a prosthetic. It's far too straight isn't it? 


No, I think it’s straight because of how he’s leaning to one side, it is natural to straighten the supporting leg in such a posture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Miss Jones said:

That's what I said, a prosthetic. It's far too straight isn't it? 

 

The arm is very straight, but the hand is wrong for a prosthetic - contemporary lower-arm prostheses tended to have a practical open-handed form. It's just an awkward pose by someone who has been told to stay completely still and not fiddle with his hands while trying to maintain his balance as he half-perches on that podium (which is probably not securely fixed to the floor).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 06/09/2020 at 13:01, Dai Bach y Sowldiwr said:

The first shot certainly is a strange one.

As you say, the quality isn't good.

Could you get a High resolution scan rather than a grab shot from a smartphone?

I think the right ear is there, you can just see the upper tip, I guess the rest isn't visible because of the rotation of the head.

I don't feel the face and eyes are disfigured, I think they just show the variation that is normal between the two sides of the face.

However, it seems that the face and the hair do not belong together.

It could be a wig.

But the face does seem a little disproportionally large.

Could the photo be a composite shot, with one man's face superimposed on another body?

Photographers could manipulate images in those days, 70 years before Photoshop.

They invented copy, paste, cut, dodge, burn, mask etc.etc.

I had the same reaction when looking at the picture. The face/head does not fit the rest of the photo. The face is too large and it looks clearer than the rest of the photo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone so far who's given input. Much appreciated. Here's another guy, I think, he's William Griffith Jones. I need positive proof yet and am hoping to have this confirmed via long list family on ancestry who I've just contacted. But he's a handsome young man. If it is William, I can take comfort in the fact that I know he survived the war and married a lovely lady. 

IMG_20200907_171118.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely RWF and seems to be wearing the 1914-15 star ribbon, which suggests a photo taken late 1917 into 1918.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Dai Bach y Sowldiwr said:

Was he from Llanbedrgoch?

The person I refer to yes, llanbedrgochoch, you'll see him living at Croesfryn with his family, father Owen, mother Mary, brothers John and Henry. As I say, i think it's him on the photo but not certain. 

Edited by Miss Jones
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Miss Jones said:

The person I refer to yes, llanbedrgochoch, you'll see him living at Croesfryn with his family, father Owen, mother Mary, brothers John and Henry. As I say, i think it's him on the photo but not certain. 

AVL Spring 1918:

Jones, William Griffith Croesfryn 92008 Pte., 3rd R.W.F.

Trying to find his MIC, but can't find it at the moment.

And his brother in 1918:

Jones, John Owen Croesfryn 213108 Pte., 7th Sect., G.B.D., R.A., Details, R.F.A.
   

 

Both the same in June 1919, but by 1920, WG's entry is printed as:

Jones, William Griffith           Croesfryn               T/450562              Pte R.A.M.C.

 

This must surely be a typo, but I wonder if  he was R.A.S.C judging from the Service number.

 

 

   
Edited by Dai Bach y Sowldiwr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Dai Bach y Sowldiwr said:

AVL Spring 1918:

Jones, William Griffith Croesfryn 92008 Pte., 3rd R.W.F.

 

 

Trying to find his MIC, but can't find it at the moment.

 

And his brother:

Jones, John Owen Croesfryn 213108 Pte., 7th Sect., G.B.D., R.A. Details, R.F.A.

I have photos of uncle John in his uniform. He cared for the horses in the army and on the farm, Croesfryn. Huge shire horses that I remember so well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Miss Jones said:

I have photos of uncle John in his uniform. He cared for the horses in the army and on the farm, Croesfryn. Huge shire horses that I remember so well. 

That would fit with RFA then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My 'uncle' John Owen Jones. Always called me Gwynneth Bach. 

FB_IMG_1599507647564.jpg

Edited by Miss Jones
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My father worked for the Milk Marketing Board, and knew every farm in the county.

If they were still farming after 1948, my father would have known them.

1 minute ago, IPT said:

If William was born 1898, isn't he too young to be the man with the 14/15 star? Also, he has no MIC.

Can't find a MIC under his RWF or RAMC/RASC numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, IPT said:

If William was born 1898, isn't he too young to be the man with the 14/15 star? Also, he has no MIC.

I'll check his birth date. Thanks 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Dai Bach y Sowldiwr said:

My father worked for the Milk Marketing Board, and knew every farm in the county.

If they were still farming after 1948, my father would have known them.

Can't find a MIC under his RWF or RAMC/RASC numbers.

Yes, it ended up just my nain and John running the farm up to about 1972ish. I'll have to check the date. The family of John had run it from very early 1900s. There was the old house first. Then the new one was built. Still stands now but looks a bit different outside and totally different in! 

1 minute ago, IPT said:

Obviously, men did serve underage.

 

According to the LLT, the 3rd Bn were in Ireland in 1918.  Perhaps William served there for the duration?

Would that be Limerick by any chance?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...