Guest Posted 23 September , 2020 Share Posted 23 September , 2020 Could some kind-hearted colleague save me guessing and tell me what exactly a Medical Quartermaster did? I have a local casualty, Lieutenant Ernest Glenny, RAMC-qualified at Barts 1917, commissioned RAMC August 1917 and shipped out to 3 British General Hospital at Basra in March 1918 (died of illness,9th October 1918). He seems to have been qualified in surgery. Of course, one has an image of any Quartermaster being a senior time-served NCO noted for having a tubby girth and an obstructive and "by the book" mindset. Obviously, this could not apply to Glenny- as being both young and an officer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaureenE Posted 23 September , 2020 Share Posted 23 September , 2020 1910 article "The Practical Duties of a Quartermaster, Royal Army Medical Corps, in a General Hospital, and Inferentially in any other Field Medical Unit" about the situation in South Africa from Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps https://militaryhealth.bmj.com/content/jramc/14/3/285.full.pdf Cheers Maureen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted 23 September , 2020 Share Posted 23 September , 2020 Thanks Maureene-as ever. Very helpful, twice over-It answers the question and also lets me know that BMJ is digitised (well, sort of) and can be accessed by idiots such as Your Humble Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dai Bach y Sowldiwr Posted 23 September , 2020 Share Posted 23 September , 2020 He seems to have been qualified in surgery. By that do you mean he was MRCS, LRCP ? Those degrees were pretty standard London Hospital degrees back then, called 'Conjoint'. MRCS doesn't really mean someone is specifically surgically trained, it was just the standard part of the undergraduate course, as it is nowadays, where graduates usually get MB., BCh (Or ChB, or BS...) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conjoint (I can't imagine he was already an FRCS (a proper surgeon) seeing as he only qualified the year before he died.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted 23 September , 2020 Share Posted 23 September , 2020 DB- Thanks for the update- I was being a little bit shorthand in what I put, the main query being the one as the header. I am well aware that the 2 degrees go together-a medical equivalent of Morrisons and BOGOFF- Buy One Get One Free. My man Glenny was the also the winner of the Willett Medal in his year, given for the best marks in the Brackenbury Examination in Surgery. In my write-up, I only suggest he may have been specialising in surgery- given also the sheer quantity of soldiers treated at Barts during the war. The hospital journal shows, with some of its articles and case reports, that Barts did a lot of surgical work on soldiers during the war- I suspect the more specialist stuff done after the front-line or base hospital treatments in France. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaureenE Posted 24 September , 2020 Share Posted 24 September , 2020 ... and also lets me know that BMJ is digitised (well, sort of) and can be accessed by idiots such as Your Humble The article above was not from what is usually meant by BMJ [British Medical Journal] but from Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps. An Archive from 1903. The "Corps News" may not be not indexed, but appears as a separate section at the back of each monthly edition. Note: the content of the Archive is searchable. Pdf files to access, by article. From 2020 the title changed to BMJ Military Health. Cheers Maureen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted 24 September , 2020 Share Posted 24 September , 2020 Thank you Maureene-I just managed to crack it and have a browse. By chance, one of my 3 local doctor casualties had a brother who popped up- an article from July 1915 on his treating hundreds of early gas casualties at 8 CCS,Bailleul, Very readable and very good on the early attempts to treat...... and totally unknown to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wexflyer Posted 25 September , 2020 Share Posted 25 September , 2020 On 23/09/2020 at 14:50, Maureene said: 1910 article "The Practical Duties of a Quartermaster, Royal Army Medical Corps, in a General Hospital, and Inferentially in any other Field Medical Unit" about the situation in South Africa from Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps https://militaryhealth.bmj.com/content/jramc/14/3/285.full.pdf Cheers Maureen But this only reinforces the original discrepancy that GUEST is trying to resolve. The quartermaster position described in that article is that for a soldier-clerk, not a medical doctor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dai Bach y Sowldiwr Posted 25 September , 2020 Share Posted 25 September , 2020 On 25/09/2020 at 09:17, Wexflyer said: But this only reinforces the original discrepancy that GUEST is trying to resolve. The quartermaster position described in that article is that for a soldier-clerk, not a medical doctor. More like a modern day medical director then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaureenE Posted 25 September , 2020 Share Posted 25 September , 2020 On 25/09/2020 at 09:17, Wexflyer said: But this only reinforces the original discrepancy that GUEST is trying to resolve. The quartermaster position described in that article is that for a soldier-clerk, not a medical doctor. We must have interpreted the article in different ways. To me, being responsible for all aspects of a hospital other than clinical care, is a responsible job involving lots of decision making and requiring initiative, including if medical supplies are not easily to be had and substitutes have to be produced. The article spoke about running a 1000 bed hospital. In addition to the patients there would be all the hospital staff to care for the patients. Being responsible for all medical supplies and equipment , and for all other supplies for patients and staff, in addition to matters of sanitation and building construction, to me, all add up to a very responsible job, not the work that a soldier-clerk could do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wexflyer Posted 25 September , 2020 Share Posted 25 September , 2020 (edited) 4 hours ago, Maureene said: We must have interpreted the article in different ways. To me, being responsible for all aspects of a hospital other than clinical care, is a responsible job involving lots of decision making and requiring initiative, including if medical supplies are not easily to be had and substitutes have to be produced. The article spoke about running a 1000 bed hospital. In addition to the patients there would be all the hospital staff to care for the patients. Being responsible for all medical supplies and equipment , and for all other supplies for patients and staff, in addition to matters of sanitation and building construction, to me, all add up to a very responsible job, not the work that a soldier-clerk could do. But wasn't clerk specifically mentioned along the way? In fact, there is a section where the author specifically says that a wise/good CO would not try to make the quartermaster also do his "previous job" of clerk. Edited 25 September , 2020 by Wexflyer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davidbohl Posted 25 September , 2020 Share Posted 25 September , 2020 Here's the term used in context during the Boer War, hope it may help. From the BNA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now