Jump to content
The Great War (1914-1918) Forum

Regiment id please - horse mounted


davidbohl

Recommended Posts

Both photos are of the same man

Just a name at the moment, Herbert Travis b.1891 Staveley, Derbyshire

Is that the Imperial Service badge on the right breast ?

thanks

Dave

TravisH_2.jpg

TravisH_1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes to badge, so presumably a territorial.

sorry I can’t help further.

Simon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Yes to the Imperial Service Tablet, and he’s got a three part shoulder title. I’m afraid I can’t  make out the cap badge or shoulder title. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my enquirer has pointed to a pension card

Name: Herbert Travis
Record Type: Card
Residence Place: Oldham
Service Number: 53838, 78578
Corps, Regiment or Unit: L.c., (M.r.), (L.r)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being mounted rather suggested to me that he could be cavalry, artillery or ASC.

A very quick search of MIC came up with three hits, including:

Herbert TRAVIS, 180905, RGA

Any papers or other to match his birth details???

M

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, davidbohl said:

my enquirer has pointed to a pension card

Name: Herbert Travis
Record Type: Card
Residence Place: Oldham
Service Number: 53838, 78578
Corps, Regiment or Unit: L.c., (M.r.), (L.r)

From a second pension card = Unit: Labour Corps - Address: 51 West End Street, Oldham - Born: 1884 - Discharged: 5.3.19 -  Disability: VDH

M

Edit: Also, from a third pension card Died: 26.12.1974  Widow: Alice

Edited by Matlock1418
Edit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

9 minutes ago, Matlock1418 said:

Unit: Labour Corps - Address: 51 West End Street, Oldham

Thanks Matlock, question mark on 1884 (is that the wifes?)

27 West End St in 1911 aged 20, aged 10 in 1901

Edited by davidbohl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, davidbohl said:

Thanks Matlock, question mark on 1884

Can't vouch for its accuracy but 1884 is what's on the pension ledger index card

M

Edited by Matlock1418
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Electoral rolls from 1918

West End St Herbert Travis unit Labour Batt

Manchester Road Herbert Travis 180905 Gnr 128th Hvy Bty RGA

Later man also has 3 other Travis on the page  in Manchester Rd- Crompton RE, George 2nd Monmouth and Harry Roy Fus

 

 

Edited by Mark1959
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, davidbohl said:

question mark on 1884 (is that the wifes?)

No, it is recorded as his on his disability PLIC [53838]

M

Edited by Matlock1418
add his 53838 number
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And in 1919 West End St. Number 51 West End St 53838 Labour Corps

Edited by Mark1959
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, davidbohl said:

my enquirer has pointed to a pension card

Name: Herbert Travis
Record Type: Card
Residence Place: Oldham
Service Number: 53838, 78578
Corps, Regiment or Unit: L.c., (M.r.), (L.r)

TRAVIS, Bert - MIC78578, The King's (Liverpool) Regiment, 53838 Labour Corps [same numbers as this discharge PIC]

M

Edit: Worth checking the Medal Roll for the KLR Bn.

Edited by Matlock1418
edit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's brilliant, well done all

Does the horse photo look suspect as he has a bandolier ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Herbert Travis at 51 West End St is still there in 1939 Born 28/9/1889 according to that. Inferred wife Alice born 1982. 1892. Inferred daughter Violet C born 1918. 3 other records blanked

Staveley man baptised there 15/10/1890. 

Edited by Mark1959
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, davidbohl said:

That's brilliant, well done all

Does the horse photo look suspect as he has a bandolier ?

Bandoliers are normal equipment for mounted personnel. Whatever their precise role they were still expected to have a rifle and some means of carrying the ammunition for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whilst your search suggests he was an infantryman which might seem at odds with the horse, the mounted angle could perhaps infer either to him being in the Transport Section (each Infantry battalion had a section with horse-drawn wagons to carry the Bn Equipment, rations stocks etc.) or in a Mounted Infantry Company.  The Mounted Infantry were a hang-over from the Boer War were the distances involved saw the infantry forming mounted companies who used horses to increase the range and speed of travel (although they fought as infantry and dismounted -no swords or lances etc: so no fancy cavalry charges).

The Infantry maintained this capability after the Boer War with a specialist school in Aldershot and units keeping a cadre capability but the Cavalry were not happy about their encroachment into cavalry capabilities and were reluctant to supply the horses, Farrier support etc - with this lack of support  and downright opposition, this infantry capability had petered out by 1913. The Transport Sections, however, continued in the Infantry Battalions throughout the Great War.

The Bandolier along with other elements such as jodhpurs, riding boots were part of the issue to both Mounted Infantry and Transport Sections and can often be seen mixed in amongst the ranks in photos of infantry units, Attached is one of my Great Grandfather (Albert Fyfe: seated left) in the Seaforth Highlanders Mounted Infantry Unit in 1904/5 -note the Bandoliers, riding boots and crops.

image.png.9b45c57c16bed4a8bc89b153716a2edf.png

image.png.8f68f31e29279abfeb5c720d683f0436.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The soldier who is the topic of this thread is Territorial Force, whose infantry did not maintain a mounted infantry (MI) section, but established instead cyclist sections (in some cases whole battalions).  Ergo on this particular occasion MI are not relevant in terms of attempting to identify the man’s unit.  

Edited by FROGSMILE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frogsmile,

Many thanks for the clarification - ever expanding my knowledge on these things.  ....so maybe Transport Section then?

Regards

Lee

image.png.f38912b8a7730efeaf1bf2f250a338ab.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Lee Smart said:

Frogsmile,

Many thanks for the clarification - ever expanding my knowledge on these things.  ....so maybe Transport Section then?

Regards

Lee

image.png.f38912b8a7730efeaf1bf2f250a338ab.png

Yes, possibly so Lee.  My understanding is that for annual camps TF infantry units hired sufficient horses to practise some of the functions of the transport, but never to full establishment (which was substantial).  They only received a full establishment of wagons, and draught animals on mobilisation (most coming from the enormous mobilisation depot at Weedon).

Edited by FROGSMILE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's of any help, 'No Labour, No Battle', John Starling and Ivor Lee 2014, tells us that LC number 53838 would have joined LC Feb-Mar 18.

Acknown

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 04/09/2022 at 11:37, Lee Smart said:

Attached is one of my Great Grandfather (Albert Fyfe: seated left) in the Seaforth Highlanders Mounted Infantry Unit in 1904/5 -note the Bandoliers, riding boots and crops.

Maybe off thread topic - but great photos Lee. Thanks for sharing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...