Chris_Baker Posted 28 October , 2003 Share Posted 28 October , 2003 This is a photograph of Charles William Lovelock. This man was eventually commissioned. Here is his story: Born 28 July 1895 Lived at 18 Chatsworth Street, Clapton, London Enlisted in 12th Battalion, the Rifle Brigade 3 March 1915 with regimental number 2529 Became the Sergeant of the battalion Machine Gun Section Wounded in the leg 12 October 1915, returned to unit 19 May 1916 Applied for a commission 10 June 1916 and attended No 8 Officer Cadet Battalion in Lichfield Went back to his original unit, in France On 28 October 1917, evacuated with shell shock, having been "knocked over by two shells" Attended the VAD Hospital in Exeter Now, a number of things are not gelling for me here. Rifle Brigade - yes, uniform and badge appears to be RB. Sergeant - yes, but a very qualified one and wearing dress uniform - doesn't really match up with a March 1915 recruit? I would appreciate any thoughts on whether the man described in the text is the same man as in the photo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Posted 28 October , 2003 Share Posted 28 October , 2003 Born 28 July 1895 Hello Chris I think the man in the photo looks much older than very early twenties. Andy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
christine liava'a Posted 28 October , 2003 Share Posted 28 October , 2003 What did he do after the war? Did he stay on in the army, and this photo was taken later? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_Baker Posted 28 October , 2003 Author Share Posted 28 October , 2003 He was discharged in 1918, as a Second Lieutenant. I did wonder about his age on the photo, but on second look I did think he might be 20+ behind that fearsome moustache. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CROONAERT Posted 29 October , 2003 Share Posted 29 October , 2003 Sergeant - yes, but a very qualified one and wearing dress uniform - doesn't really match up with a March 1915 recruit? Maybe not ,Chris, but the fact that he hasn't any medals or ribbons up does. Dave. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terry_Reeves Posted 1 November , 2003 Share Posted 1 November , 2003 Chris I am pretty sure that this is a pre-war photograph. I have several pictures of RE's wearing a similar pattern tunic and hat, all dating between 1908 - 1910. I would be suprised if he had been issued this pattern of uniform from 1915 onwards. No doubt there will be somebody better qualified than me who can throw more light on the subject of uniform though. As a matter of interest, the badge on the right forearm was given to the section commanders of the best shooting squadron or company in a regiment or battalion. Terry Reeves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_Baker Posted 11 November , 2003 Author Share Posted 11 November , 2003 I think I've gotthis now. The Charles William Lovelock whose story I wrote to open this thread is NOT the man in the photo. His officers file shows that although he came from a smimilar area, he lived in a different road and his family names do not match up. I now believe this to be 560467 Sapper C. W. Lovelock, who was formerly with the London Regiment. And judging by the badges I reckon 19th Battalion. He joined 2nd London Divisional Signals Company - which is a good match to his obvious signallers qualifications! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now